[1]陶涛涛,吴兴华.马克思与怀特海人学思想比较研究[J].唐都学刊,2019,35(02):44-50.
 TAO Tao-tao,WU Xing-hua.A Comparative Study of Marx's and Whitehead's Humanistic Thought[J].,2019,35(02):44-50.
点击复制

马克思与怀特海人学思想比较研究
分享到:

《唐都学刊》[ISSN:1001-0300/CN:61-1056/C]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
44-50
栏目:
哲学研究
出版日期:
2019-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study of Marx's and Whitehead's Humanistic Thought
作者:
陶涛涛 吴兴华
(安徽师范大学 马克思主义学院,安徽 芜湖 241002)
Author(s):
TAO Tao-tao WU Xing-hua
(College of Marxism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China)
关键词:
马克思 怀特海 人的价值 人道主义 社会文明
Keywords:
Marx Whitehead human value humanitarianism social civilization
分类号:
B08
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
人的问题是任何哲学都无法回避的问题,马克思和怀特海对此均有不同的贡献。怀特海从有机论、整体论和有神论的视角对人及其社会进行了重构,而马克思则以辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义为理论基础,对有关人的问题及其未来社会的发展提供了科学的指导。在对人的价值、人道主义和社会文明三者的对比分析中,马克思和怀特海都展现了各自人学思想的理论特色。通过对怀特海人学思想的挖掘、考察和研究,能够拓宽我们对马克思主义研究的理论视野,进而为丰富马克思主义人学思想提供有益的借鉴。
Abstract:
No philosophy can avoid the human problem, to which Marx and Whitehead have different contributions. Whitehead reconstructed people and society from the perspectives of organism, holism and theism, while Marx provided theoretical basis for dialectical materialism and historical materialism, and provided scientific guidance about the human problem and their future social development. In the comparative analysis of human value, humanitarianism and social civilization, both Marx and Whitehead demonstrated the theoretical characteristics of their respective humanistic thoughts. The exploration, investigation and research of Whitehead's ideology can broaden our theoretical horizons into Marxist research and provide useful references for enriching Marxist humanism.

相似文献/References:

[1]马 葵.论马克思金融理论与 当前我国金融市场规范发展[J].唐都学刊,2018,(05):100.
 MA Kui.On Marx's Financial Theory and the Standardized Development of China's Current Financial Market[J].,2018,(02):100.
[2]喻聪舟,刘锦诺.“一带一路”倡议的过程哲学审视[J].唐都学刊,2019,35(01):34.
 YU Cong-zhou,LIU Jin-nuo.Review of the Process Philosophy for the Belt and Road Initiative[J].,2019,35(02):34.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01